<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Klik?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://zabica.org/uros/klik/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://zabica.org/uros/klik</link>
	<description>Exploring the good and the bad about the world of Computer Science!</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 23:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jure</title>
		<link>http://zabica.org/uros/klik#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>Jure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2005 05:51:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zabica.marjetica.com/uros/?p=88#comment-42</guid>
		<description>Klik is ok at first. But in the long run I don't think it would work for large collection of applications because of shared libs and stuff. With Klik you would probably get _more_ unsolvable problems then with normal packaging software.

Up-to-now I think autopackage is the closest to what you'd want to achieve.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Klik is ok at first. But in the long run I don&#8217;t think it would work for large collection of applications because of shared libs and stuff. With Klik you would probably get _more_ unsolvable problems then with normal packaging software.</p>
<p>Up-to-now I think autopackage is the closest to what you&#8217;d want to achieve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

